Comment by mfenniak
6 days ago
On the plus side, Forgejo Action's implementation is still actively improving, where it seems that for GitHub if it's not AI, it's not being touched.
However, as noted in the article, Forgejo's implementation currently has all the same "package manager" problems.
Good point, also to illustrate that open-source is not a panacea. It merely holds a higher potential for certain issues to be fixed/improved than.
I don't know why they basically copied GHA.
AFAIK because "act", the tool to run github actions locally, was there and there was no need to create something else. Also makes it easier for people to switch from github.
Also see https://docs.gitea.com/usage/actions/design