Comment by jacquesm
3 days ago
No, you need to prove that it is not plagiarism when you use an LLM to produce a piece of code that you then claim as yours.
You have the whole burden of proof thing backwards.
3 days ago
No, you need to prove that it is not plagiarism when you use an LLM to produce a piece of code that you then claim as yours.
You have the whole burden of proof thing backwards.
Oh wild, I was operating under the assumption that the law requires you to prove that a law was broken, but it turns out you need to prove it wasn't. Thanks!