← Back to context

Comment by socalgal2

2 days ago

Yea, the one that includes all the previous "one-shot" failures.

If you throw 4 basketballs at a hoop and only the 4th one makes it in, that's not "one-shot". It's 4.

Your definition appears to be, after many failed attempts, a single prompt that gets the AI to complete the task was found. You called that "one-shot" but what really happened is there were several "shots" that failed.

If three of my friends that have never played basketball take a shot and they all miss, that doesn't say anything about my ability to make a shot. Obviously, my friends are inexperienced with basketball. There is nothing wrong with that, but it's not a fair or just argument to tell people who do have experience that "your success not a true one-shot because other, inexperienced people, failed".

You appear to be extending the definition of "one-shot" to "an LLM should be able to accomplish anything no matter how poorly it was prompted", which is, I hope you can agree, not very reasonable. It's certainly not something I would be arguing in favor of.

  • your shot is not dependent on your 3 friends. The "one-shot" prompt only happened because they took the info from previous failed attempts to guide their prompt

    • You seem to be saying that I never would have thought of how to prompt Claude until I became inspired by reading the post yesterday. But I use Claude with Playwright + screenshots basically daily.

I can one-shot a 10-footer, might need few attempts to hit a half-court shot. not all shots are created equal but I have seen many full-court one-shots by LLMs which would have taken human (other than Steph) tens if not hundreds of shots :)