← Back to context

Comment by embedding-shape

19 hours ago

Claude Code has absolutely zero features that help me review code or do anything else than vibe-coding and accept changes as they come in. We need diff-comparisons between different executions, tailored TUI for that kind of work and more. Claude Code is basically a MVP of that.

Still, I do use Claude Code and Codex daily as there is nothing better out there currently. But they still feel tailored towards vibe-coding instead of professional development.

10 comments

embedding-shape

Reply
vidarh  18 hours ago

I really do not want those things in Claude COde - I much prefer choosing my own diff tools etc. and running them in a separate terminal. If they start stuffing too much into the TUI they'd ruin it - if you want all that stuff built in, they have the VS Code integration.

  • Havoc  12 hours ago

    Mind elaborating a bit on the diff tool / flow you’re using? Trying to follow along better with what CC is doing

    • jbs789  5 hours ago

      Claude code run in a VS Code terminal window pops up a diff in VSCode before making changes. Not sure if that helps. I do have the Claude Code extension installed too.

      I find the flow works bc if it starts going off piste I just end it. Plus I then get my pre-commit hooks etc. I still like being relatively hands on though.

  • embedding-shape  18 hours ago

    Me neither, hence the stated preference for something completely new and different, a stab in the different direction instead of the same boring iteration on yet another agentic TUI coder.

johnfn  18 hours ago

> Claude Code has absolutely zero features that help me review code

Err, doesn’t it have /review?

victorbjorklund  17 hours ago

What’s wrong with using GIT for reviewing the changes?

  • embedding-shape  15 hours ago

    Are any of them integrated with git? AFAIK, you'd have to instruct them to use git for you if you don't want to do it manually.

    Imagine a GUI built around git branches + agents working in those branches + tooling to manage the orchestration and small review points, rather than "here's a chat and tool calling, glhf".

    • KronisLV  2 hours ago

      > Are any of them integrated with git?

      All of the models that can do tool calls are typically good enough to use Git.

      Just this week I used both Claude Code and Codex to look at unstaged/staged changes and to review them multiple times, even do comparison between a feature branch and the main branch to identify why a particular feature might have broken in the feature branch.