← Back to context

Comment by th0ma5

15 hours ago

[flagged]

Condescending and disrespectful to whom? Everybody wholsale? This doesnt seem reasonable? Please elaborate.

  • Not sure if I'd use the same descriptions so pointedly, but I can see what they mean.

    It's perfectly fine to link for convenience, but it does feel a little disrespectful/SEO-y to not 'continue the conversation'. A summary in the very least, how exactly it pertains. Sell us.

    In a sense, link-dropping [alone] is saying: "go read this and establish my rhetorical/social position, I'm done here"

    Imagine meeting an author/producer/whatever you liked. You'd want to talk about their work, how they created it, the impact it had, and so on. Now imagine if they did that... or if they waved their hand vaguely at a catalog.

    • I've genuinely been answering the question "what if the labs are training on your pelican benchmark" 3-4 times a week for several months at this point. I wrote that piece precisely so I didn't have to copy and paste the same arguments into dozens of different conversations.

      5 replies →

    • Hell, I would consider myself graced that simonw, yes, THAT simonw, the LLM whisperer, took time out of his busy schedule to send me to a discussion I might have expressed interest in.

      2 replies →

  • No, when did I say that?

    • It isn't clear what you said.

      You asserted a pattern of conduct on the user simonw:

      > I think constantly replying to everybody with some link which doesn't address their concerns

      Then claimed that conduct was:

      > condescending and disrespectful.

      I am asking you to elaborate to whom simonw is condescending and disrespecting. I don't see how it follows.