Comment by SoftTalker
17 hours ago
Wait until you learn that the people on the other side of your ticket updates are also using LLMs to respond. It's LLMs talking to LLMs now.
17 hours ago
Wait until you learn that the people on the other side of your ticket updates are also using LLMs to respond. It's LLMs talking to LLMs now.
Wait until you learn that most people's writing skills are that of below LLMs, so it's an actual tangible improvement (as long as you review the output for details not being missed, of course)
Hoisted by your own petard ("me old fruit"):
"Wait until you learn that most people's writing skills are that of below LLMs"
... went askew at "that of below LLMs".
I'm an arse: soz!
The desired result is coming to a documented agreement on an interaction, not some exercise in argument that has to happen between humans.
I find having an LLM create tickets for itself to implement to be an effective tool that I rarely have to provide feedback for at all.
This seems like greybeards complaining that people who don't write assembly by hand.
Who has ever complained that kids don't write assembly by hand?
Stop being outraged for things that are only real on your mind.
Speaking of things that are only real in your mind...
Am I outraged?
And yes, there absolutely was a vocal group of a certain type of programmer complaining about high level languages like C and their risks and inefficiency and lack of control insisting that real programmers wrote code in assembly. It's hard to find references because google sucks these days and I'm not really willing to put in the effort.
4 replies →