← Back to context Comment by vlovich123 12 hours ago About as real as claiming that C/C++ is memory safe because of sanitizers IMHO. 2 comments vlovich123 Reply Ygg2 9 hours ago I mean, Zig does have non-null pointers. It prevents some UB. Just not all. pjmlp 6 hours ago Which you can achieve in C and C++ with static analysis rules, breaking compilation if pointers aren't checked for nullptr/NULL before use.Zig would have been a nice proposition in the 20th century, alongside languages like Modula-2 and Object Pascal.
Ygg2 9 hours ago I mean, Zig does have non-null pointers. It prevents some UB. Just not all. pjmlp 6 hours ago Which you can achieve in C and C++ with static analysis rules, breaking compilation if pointers aren't checked for nullptr/NULL before use.Zig would have been a nice proposition in the 20th century, alongside languages like Modula-2 and Object Pascal.
pjmlp 6 hours ago Which you can achieve in C and C++ with static analysis rules, breaking compilation if pointers aren't checked for nullptr/NULL before use.Zig would have been a nice proposition in the 20th century, alongside languages like Modula-2 and Object Pascal.
I mean, Zig does have non-null pointers. It prevents some UB. Just not all.
Which you can achieve in C and C++ with static analysis rules, breaking compilation if pointers aren't checked for nullptr/NULL before use.
Zig would have been a nice proposition in the 20th century, alongside languages like Modula-2 and Object Pascal.