Comment by Propelloni
4 days ago
If it is about professionalism, why mention DEIA at all? It's just virtue-signalling. Reuters realized that and pointed it out.
4 days ago
If it is about professionalism, why mention DEIA at all? It's just virtue-signalling. Reuters realized that and pointed it out.
[flagged]
> It was Blinken that arbitrarily introduced
The _second paragraph_ of TFA gives a reason for the introduction. Please explain how you came to the conclusion that the change was arbitrary.
The definition of “arbitrary” includes “upon personal whim”, i.e., the State Dept leadership, not coordinated across or with other depts, and “not in a systematic manner”.
I get that people’s biases make accepting reality difficult, but this will all end poorly if you can’t even just be objective on basic things like it being detrimental for one single department of the federal government to arbitrarily change rather significant things like the official font, even worn text, communication is the primary work product and format.
Why did you ignore all the other aspects and simply latch onto something you thought was a loophole because you cannot objectively adapt a relevant definition?
This is not reddit. You should have higher standards for yourself.