Comment by notnullorvoid
3 days ago
> If memory management and ability to handle complex graph processing efficiently isn't related to architecture to you I don't know what to tell you.
Rust can do complex graph processing, as well as efficient easy memory management, but it's going to do it in a different structure than a GCed lang would. Hence my statement that 1 to 1 translation was the primary factor.
> CTRL+F "rust" on the Go issue and see how many results you get.
Yes and so what? There's 35 for .NET or 74 for C#, yet you don't see people claiming the C# cult was harassing the TS team.
Obviously, C# is one of Microsoft's flagship language along with TypeScript.
So it's expected to be frequently mentioned there.
Sure, and Rust is the most used language for modern TS/JS tooling, outside of TS/JS. There would have been substantial ecosystem benefits had Rust been chosen.
Do you have a source for that?
Because esbuild is Go. tac was TypeScript and will be Go. Bun is Zig.
Come to think of it. I don't use a single Rust tool for the web. node is c++. deno breaks too much.
So, do you have a source for your claim?
1 reply →