Comment by dlubarov
4 days ago
There’s no question that Hezbollah’s bombardment was terrorism. It would be absurd to claim that they were targeting military assets when they routinely use unguided rockets which aren’t capable of doing so. Israel had every right to enter Lebanon in response.
[flagged]
Suppose we believe all captions in your links, so for example we'll assume that guy in shorts and flip flops was some sort of “spy balloon manager.”
It wouldn’t matter, because once you perform terrorist attacks, you’re still a terrorist even if you also attack valid targets sometimes. Same as Hamas, which is still a terrorist org despite attacking some IDF bases.
Even Amnesty has acknowledged Hezbollah’s routine use of unguided rockets, which can’t possibly target military assets but are just lobbed in the general direction of population centers. That makes them terrorists, regardless of what else they do.
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/12/israel-hezbol...
Could you quote from that article where Amnesty makes a statement calling actions by armed factions of Hezbollah terrorism?
4 replies →
Resistance to occupation and attack isn't "terrorism", that word has no meaning anymore.