← Back to context

Comment by lokar

3 days ago

The article explains that for a supermarket Pepsi is a must have product, they loose to many customers if they don’t have it.

Only one company sells it (obviously). Pepsi is enforcing a retail price differential between Walmart and other retailers.

This is a violation of US law

> they loose to many customers if they don’t have it.

Good thing they do have it, at a marginally higher price.

> This is a violation of US law

It may very well be, but that is not what I contended.