Comment by timschmidt
2 days ago
> you're the one
> Utter nonsense
> conspiracy theories
> tin foil hats
> assorted claims that direct quotes, posted documents, contain or do not contain things contrary to what anyone can read in them
So, just more of the same behavior ChatGPT dismantled effortlessly.
> Instead of trying to use ChatGPT
I see why you didn't like it. I think I'll use it more.
ChatGPT didn't validate your tinfoil hat beliefs. It simply didn't like the words I used to call them out. Once again, you believe that the government is doing massively illegal spying despite the fact that numerous leaks have shown it is not. You originally based your beliefs on misreporting of the leaks, but when that was corrected, you clung to your silly beliefs by using speculation from somebody who never claimed to have seen anything illegal that also goes against the leaks.
I use the words I do because I have known people who talk about ice bullets, chemtrails, and silent black helicopters, and the way they come to their beliefs is exactly the same as the way you have come to yours. If you see them as silly, you should be able to understand why I feel the same about you.
Now unless you engage with the facts of whether the NSA has access to all your FAANG data or not, I think we're done. You don't like the way I characterize your beliefs, and I accept that, but what I'm looking for here is evidence against my assertion.