← Back to context

Comment by NuclearPM

6 days ago

I don’t know why you quoted the addresses.

It's polite to give parsers (human or otherwise) hints that they're about to encounter text which is now intended for a different kind of parser.

I recently forgot to surround my code in ``` and Gemini refused to help with it (I think I tripped a safety guardrail, it thought I was targeting it with an injection attack). Amusingly, the two ways to work around it were to fence off my code with backticks or to just respond to:

> I can't help you with that

With

> Why not?

After which it was then willing to help with the unquoted code. Presumably it then perceived it as some kind of philosophical puzzle rather than an attack.

  • It's disappointing to see people here use language like "perceived" for an LLM.

    • As a panpsychist I have no special esteem for an LLM's perceptive powers. I also anticipate that the planet perceives us as nuisance.

Fair question, it does look a bit jarring when not rendered. I write a lot of markdown and it's a very strong force of habit to use backticks to sort of highlight a technical term and turn it into a noun. Similar to writing endash as a double hyphen.

When I read what I write, my eyes glance through backticks and maybe come back if I need to parse the inner term in more detail.

Tell me you don't Markdown, without telling me you don't Markdown.

It's a developer thing, using backticks means the enclosed text is emphasised when rendered from Markdown.