← Back to context Comment by Neywiny 2 months ago Header and FCS, interpacket gap, and preamble. What do you think "Ethernet overhead" is? 2 comments Neywiny Reply _zoltan_ 2 months ago I've meant in usec, sorry if that wasn't clear, given that the discussion that I've replied was about rpc latency. Neywiny 2 months ago That's a very nebulous metric. Usec of overhead depends on a lot of runtime things and a lot of hardware options and design that I'm just not privy to
_zoltan_ 2 months ago I've meant in usec, sorry if that wasn't clear, given that the discussion that I've replied was about rpc latency. Neywiny 2 months ago That's a very nebulous metric. Usec of overhead depends on a lot of runtime things and a lot of hardware options and design that I'm just not privy to
Neywiny 2 months ago That's a very nebulous metric. Usec of overhead depends on a lot of runtime things and a lot of hardware options and design that I'm just not privy to
I've meant in usec, sorry if that wasn't clear, given that the discussion that I've replied was about rpc latency.
That's a very nebulous metric. Usec of overhead depends on a lot of runtime things and a lot of hardware options and design that I'm just not privy to