← Back to context Comment by dmd 3 days ago It has nothing whatsoever to do with sinking CO2. 2 comments dmd Reply zahlman 3 days ago I understand this, but it coincidentally uses CO2 and it's hard for me to understand why the technology would sound "too good to be true" without imagining such a purpose. andruby 3 days ago It's a one-time "use" though, it's not consuming CO2, so it's not going to move any needle
zahlman 3 days ago I understand this, but it coincidentally uses CO2 and it's hard for me to understand why the technology would sound "too good to be true" without imagining such a purpose. andruby 3 days ago It's a one-time "use" though, it's not consuming CO2, so it's not going to move any needle
andruby 3 days ago It's a one-time "use" though, it's not consuming CO2, so it's not going to move any needle
I understand this, but it coincidentally uses CO2 and it's hard for me to understand why the technology would sound "too good to be true" without imagining such a purpose.
It's a one-time "use" though, it's not consuming CO2, so it's not going to move any needle