Comment by gethly
2 days ago
This is pointless discussion as Go has all of these things already implemented, so there is no point in going backwards.
2 days ago
This is pointless discussion as Go has all of these things already implemented, so there is no point in going backwards.
The point is that a (new) syntax for any language needs to support any such implementation. The language implementation itself is not the point.
Yes, and I am saying Go has already solved all of this and it makes little sense to deviate too much from its syntax.