← Back to context

Comment by the_sleaze_

2 days ago

I know this is tongue in cheek, but writing functional code in an object oriented language, or even worse just taking a giant procedural trail of tears and spreading it across a few files like a roomba through a pile of dog doo is ... well.. a code smell at best.

I have a user prompt saved called clean code to make a pass through the changes and remove unused, DRY and refactor - literally the high points of uncle bob's Clean Code. It works shockingly well at taking AI code and making it somewhat maintainable.

5 comments

the_sleaze_

Reply
KptMarchewa  1 day ago

>I know this is tongue in cheek, but writing functional code in an object oriented language, or even worse just taking a giant procedural trail of tears and spreading it across a few files like a roomba through a pile of dog doo is ... well.. a code smell at best.

After forcing myself over years to apply various OOP principles using multiple languages, I believe OOP has truly been the worst thing to happen to me personally as engineer. Now, I believe what you actually see is just an "aesthetics" issue, moreover it's purely learned aesthetics.

zx8080  2 days ago

Does its output follow the "no comments needed" principle of the uncle Bob?

coldtea  1 day ago

Not so much tongue in cheek, but a little on the light side, sure.

I'd argue writing functional code in C++ (which is multi-paradigm anyway), or Java, or Typescript is fine!