← Back to context Comment by frumplestlatz 1 day ago [flagged] 9 comments frumplestlatz Reply jdlshore 1 day ago Evidence of bad reporting at one news agency is not evidence of bad reporting at a completely different news agency. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate bad reporting, and vague insinuations don’t count. nielsbot 1 day ago No frumplestlatz 1 day ago Well, thanks for clearing that up. It’s not like there’s a pattern of this now or anything. nielsbot 1 day ago Pattern of… what? Misrepresenting the administration? Or immigrant (and others) detention?On the other hand the thin-skinned fascists in the admin have a history of trying to silence the truth about them.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2025/12/cbs-news-bari-w... 2 replies → nutjob2 1 day ago 60 Minutes suddenly drops in quality when reporting on Trump? They had a fine reputation before this incident and paying Trump $16 million.Whats the BBC got to do with CBS? doganugurlu 16 hours ago They both have B in the middle - obvious irrefutable link between them. If you can’t figure out how that makes sense, OP doesn’t have anything to say!/s frumplestlatz 1 day ago Yes? BBC had a fine reputation too
jdlshore 1 day ago Evidence of bad reporting at one news agency is not evidence of bad reporting at a completely different news agency. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate bad reporting, and vague insinuations don’t count.
nielsbot 1 day ago No frumplestlatz 1 day ago Well, thanks for clearing that up. It’s not like there’s a pattern of this now or anything. nielsbot 1 day ago Pattern of… what? Misrepresenting the administration? Or immigrant (and others) detention?On the other hand the thin-skinned fascists in the admin have a history of trying to silence the truth about them.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2025/12/cbs-news-bari-w... 2 replies →
frumplestlatz 1 day ago Well, thanks for clearing that up. It’s not like there’s a pattern of this now or anything. nielsbot 1 day ago Pattern of… what? Misrepresenting the administration? Or immigrant (and others) detention?On the other hand the thin-skinned fascists in the admin have a history of trying to silence the truth about them.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2025/12/cbs-news-bari-w... 2 replies →
nielsbot 1 day ago Pattern of… what? Misrepresenting the administration? Or immigrant (and others) detention?On the other hand the thin-skinned fascists in the admin have a history of trying to silence the truth about them.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2025/12/cbs-news-bari-w... 2 replies →
nutjob2 1 day ago 60 Minutes suddenly drops in quality when reporting on Trump? They had a fine reputation before this incident and paying Trump $16 million.Whats the BBC got to do with CBS? doganugurlu 16 hours ago They both have B in the middle - obvious irrefutable link between them. If you can’t figure out how that makes sense, OP doesn’t have anything to say!/s frumplestlatz 1 day ago Yes? BBC had a fine reputation too
doganugurlu 16 hours ago They both have B in the middle - obvious irrefutable link between them. If you can’t figure out how that makes sense, OP doesn’t have anything to say!/s
Evidence of bad reporting at one news agency is not evidence of bad reporting at a completely different news agency. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate bad reporting, and vague insinuations don’t count.
No
Well, thanks for clearing that up. It’s not like there’s a pattern of this now or anything.
Pattern of… what? Misrepresenting the administration? Or immigrant (and others) detention?
On the other hand the thin-skinned fascists in the admin have a history of trying to silence the truth about them.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2025/12/cbs-news-bari-w...
2 replies →
60 Minutes suddenly drops in quality when reporting on Trump? They had a fine reputation before this incident and paying Trump $16 million.
Whats the BBC got to do with CBS?
They both have B in the middle - obvious irrefutable link between them. If you can’t figure out how that makes sense, OP doesn’t have anything to say!
/s
Yes? BBC had a fine reputation too