← Back to context Comment by frumplestlatz 2 days ago [flagged] 9 comments frumplestlatz Reply jdlshore 2 days ago Evidence of bad reporting at one news agency is not evidence of bad reporting at a completely different news agency. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate bad reporting, and vague insinuations don’t count. nielsbot 2 days ago No frumplestlatz 2 days ago [flagged] nielsbot 1 day ago Pattern of… what? Misrepresenting the administration? Or immigrant (and others) detention?On the other hand the thin-skinned fascists in the admin have a history of trying to silence the truth about them.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2025/12/cbs-news-bari-w... 2 replies → nutjob2 2 days ago 60 Minutes suddenly drops in quality when reporting on Trump? They had a fine reputation before this incident and paying Trump $16 million.Whats the BBC got to do with CBS? doganugurlu 1 day ago They both have B in the middle - obvious irrefutable link between them. If you can’t figure out how that makes sense, OP doesn’t have anything to say!/s frumplestlatz 2 days ago Yes? BBC had a fine reputation too
jdlshore 2 days ago Evidence of bad reporting at one news agency is not evidence of bad reporting at a completely different news agency. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate bad reporting, and vague insinuations don’t count.
nielsbot 2 days ago No frumplestlatz 2 days ago [flagged] nielsbot 1 day ago Pattern of… what? Misrepresenting the administration? Or immigrant (and others) detention?On the other hand the thin-skinned fascists in the admin have a history of trying to silence the truth about them.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2025/12/cbs-news-bari-w... 2 replies →
frumplestlatz 2 days ago [flagged] nielsbot 1 day ago Pattern of… what? Misrepresenting the administration? Or immigrant (and others) detention?On the other hand the thin-skinned fascists in the admin have a history of trying to silence the truth about them.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2025/12/cbs-news-bari-w... 2 replies →
nielsbot 1 day ago Pattern of… what? Misrepresenting the administration? Or immigrant (and others) detention?On the other hand the thin-skinned fascists in the admin have a history of trying to silence the truth about them.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2025/12/cbs-news-bari-w... 2 replies →
nutjob2 2 days ago 60 Minutes suddenly drops in quality when reporting on Trump? They had a fine reputation before this incident and paying Trump $16 million.Whats the BBC got to do with CBS? doganugurlu 1 day ago They both have B in the middle - obvious irrefutable link between them. If you can’t figure out how that makes sense, OP doesn’t have anything to say!/s frumplestlatz 2 days ago Yes? BBC had a fine reputation too
doganugurlu 1 day ago They both have B in the middle - obvious irrefutable link between them. If you can’t figure out how that makes sense, OP doesn’t have anything to say!/s
Evidence of bad reporting at one news agency is not evidence of bad reporting at a completely different news agency. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate bad reporting, and vague insinuations don’t count.
No
[flagged]
Pattern of… what? Misrepresenting the administration? Or immigrant (and others) detention?
On the other hand the thin-skinned fascists in the admin have a history of trying to silence the truth about them.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2025/12/cbs-news-bari-w...
2 replies →
60 Minutes suddenly drops in quality when reporting on Trump? They had a fine reputation before this incident and paying Trump $16 million.
Whats the BBC got to do with CBS?
They both have B in the middle - obvious irrefutable link between them. If you can’t figure out how that makes sense, OP doesn’t have anything to say!
/s
Yes? BBC had a fine reputation too