← Back to context

Comment by Dayshine

2 days ago

Zed is snappy in the same way that notepad ++ is snappy: If you don't support 10% of language features you can avoid the hard work. Unfortunately this means that non trivial projects have false positive errors everywhere.

Zed uses clangd, I don't think clangd support only 90% of C++ (and I don't think it avoid hard work).

Is that why they've given up on their own C++ analyzer and finally adopted clangd?