← Back to context Comment by fn-mote 2 days ago Very curious what is wrong about the rg defaults.The only one I change is to add `--no-ignore`. 1 comment fn-mote Reply petepete 15 hours ago Nothing.fd, rg and ag all work how I expect them to work and the arguments and order fit in with my expectations for modern cli applications.They're recursive, they ignore things I don't care about and I can just give them the string I'm looking for, no path, no -name or --recursive etc.find and grep do similar things but work entirely differently and their args aren't even in the same format.
petepete 15 hours ago Nothing.fd, rg and ag all work how I expect them to work and the arguments and order fit in with my expectations for modern cli applications.They're recursive, they ignore things I don't care about and I can just give them the string I'm looking for, no path, no -name or --recursive etc.find and grep do similar things but work entirely differently and their args aren't even in the same format.
Nothing.
fd, rg and ag all work how I expect them to work and the arguments and order fit in with my expectations for modern cli applications.
They're recursive, they ignore things I don't care about and I can just give them the string I'm looking for, no path, no -name or --recursive etc.
find and grep do similar things but work entirely differently and their args aren't even in the same format.