← Back to context

Comment by ankit219

19 hours ago

Its mostly true when the integrating company cares for the user experience. Which apple clearly does.

The example you shared is the opposite. I am imagining a kernel today written in a manner that airpods would be able to use it to extract the max out of it. Now, it has to support 10 other third party pods, so at the minimum, kernel would be more generalized.

6 comments

ankit219

Reply
jonway  8 hours ago

I guess if apple changes the way it works completely it would be different, with the kernel and such but like

Aren’t peripherals inherently modular kind of definitionally?

You should check that GitHub, it makes AirPod functionality mostly agnostic. The warts could (in some world) be mere bug reports for the manufacturer firmware team.

Personally, I think the Bluetooth standards suck a big one even recognizing how good it’s gotten and I _almost_ resent apple for not pushing this out as anither standard.

  • ankit219  6 hours ago

    Modular in the sense you have to support multiple hardwares (of different kinds) instead of just one. Eventually you arrive at a place where software is good enough, and hardware + kernels cannot do the exact heavy lifting that is happening today in conjunction. Not the intel level but directionally similar kind of tradeoffs.

ngetchell  16 hours ago

A company that produces a wireless mouse that charges upside down really does not care about user experience.

  • musicale  13 hours ago

    Steve Jobs loved the iMac's terrible hockey puck mouse. Jony Ive is probably to blame for the terrible (yet very thin) butterfly keyboard making it into Apple laptops. However, these missteps do not prove that Apple doesn't care about user experience.