← Back to context Comment by jrm4 1 day ago Good for them. 7 comments jrm4 Reply CamelCaseName 1 day ago Not so good for taxpayers. chowells 1 day ago Basically irrelevant to taxpayers. Their salaries or triple their salaries will add up to a difference of a couple dollars on the average tax bill. Doge didn't actually cut any of the big expenses. It was only intended to cut the effective things. exe34 1 day ago It was never about saving money for the tax payers! They voted for this. ares623 1 day ago Which is also them IAmBroom 1 day ago Please forward your next raise to me, since it will only raise your taxes. 1 reply → jrm4 1 day ago Meh, false; the cost of the disruption will almost certainly be comparable, if not outweigh, the money paid.
CamelCaseName 1 day ago Not so good for taxpayers. chowells 1 day ago Basically irrelevant to taxpayers. Their salaries or triple their salaries will add up to a difference of a couple dollars on the average tax bill. Doge didn't actually cut any of the big expenses. It was only intended to cut the effective things. exe34 1 day ago It was never about saving money for the tax payers! They voted for this. ares623 1 day ago Which is also them IAmBroom 1 day ago Please forward your next raise to me, since it will only raise your taxes. 1 reply → jrm4 1 day ago Meh, false; the cost of the disruption will almost certainly be comparable, if not outweigh, the money paid.
chowells 1 day ago Basically irrelevant to taxpayers. Their salaries or triple their salaries will add up to a difference of a couple dollars on the average tax bill. Doge didn't actually cut any of the big expenses. It was only intended to cut the effective things.
ares623 1 day ago Which is also them IAmBroom 1 day ago Please forward your next raise to me, since it will only raise your taxes. 1 reply →
IAmBroom 1 day ago Please forward your next raise to me, since it will only raise your taxes. 1 reply →
jrm4 1 day ago Meh, false; the cost of the disruption will almost certainly be comparable, if not outweigh, the money paid.
Not so good for taxpayers.
Basically irrelevant to taxpayers. Their salaries or triple their salaries will add up to a difference of a couple dollars on the average tax bill. Doge didn't actually cut any of the big expenses. It was only intended to cut the effective things.
It was never about saving money for the tax payers! They voted for this.
Which is also them
Please forward your next raise to me, since it will only raise your taxes.
1 reply →
Meh, false; the cost of the disruption will almost certainly be comparable, if not outweigh, the money paid.