← Back to context Comment by F3nd0 1 day ago … and JPEG XL is smaller than WebP. 2 comments F3nd0 Reply wewewedxfgdf 1 day ago JPEG XL looks to have pretty poor support.https://caniuse.com/jpegxl F3nd0 1 day ago Yes, though hopefully not for long; unfortunately not all codecs are given equal treatment...If having native support in a web browser is important, though, then yes, WebP is a better choice (as is JPEG).
wewewedxfgdf 1 day ago JPEG XL looks to have pretty poor support.https://caniuse.com/jpegxl F3nd0 1 day ago Yes, though hopefully not for long; unfortunately not all codecs are given equal treatment...If having native support in a web browser is important, though, then yes, WebP is a better choice (as is JPEG).
F3nd0 1 day ago Yes, though hopefully not for long; unfortunately not all codecs are given equal treatment...If having native support in a web browser is important, though, then yes, WebP is a better choice (as is JPEG).
JPEG XL looks to have pretty poor support.
https://caniuse.com/jpegxl
Yes, though hopefully not for long; unfortunately not all codecs are given equal treatment...
If having native support in a web browser is important, though, then yes, WebP is a better choice (as is JPEG).