← Back to context Comment by 112233 1 day ago since when? 5 comments 112233 Reply onraglanroad 1 day ago Since some of us could be bothered reading docs. Give it a try and see how it works out for you. 112233 1 day ago Some of us can! I certainly enjoy doing it, and according to "man 5 acl" what you assert is completely false. Unless you have a particular commit or document from kernel.org you had in mind? opello 21 hours ago > Each of these characters is replaced by the - character to denote that a permission is absent in the ACL entry.Wouldn't the o::--- default ACL, like mode o-rwx, deny others access in the way you're describing? 2 replies →
onraglanroad 1 day ago Since some of us could be bothered reading docs. Give it a try and see how it works out for you. 112233 1 day ago Some of us can! I certainly enjoy doing it, and according to "man 5 acl" what you assert is completely false. Unless you have a particular commit or document from kernel.org you had in mind? opello 21 hours ago > Each of these characters is replaced by the - character to denote that a permission is absent in the ACL entry.Wouldn't the o::--- default ACL, like mode o-rwx, deny others access in the way you're describing? 2 replies →
112233 1 day ago Some of us can! I certainly enjoy doing it, and according to "man 5 acl" what you assert is completely false. Unless you have a particular commit or document from kernel.org you had in mind? opello 21 hours ago > Each of these characters is replaced by the - character to denote that a permission is absent in the ACL entry.Wouldn't the o::--- default ACL, like mode o-rwx, deny others access in the way you're describing? 2 replies →
opello 21 hours ago > Each of these characters is replaced by the - character to denote that a permission is absent in the ACL entry.Wouldn't the o::--- default ACL, like mode o-rwx, deny others access in the way you're describing? 2 replies →
Since some of us could be bothered reading docs. Give it a try and see how it works out for you.
Some of us can! I certainly enjoy doing it, and according to "man 5 acl" what you assert is completely false. Unless you have a particular commit or document from kernel.org you had in mind?
> Each of these characters is replaced by the - character to denote that a permission is absent in the ACL entry.
Wouldn't the o::--- default ACL, like mode o-rwx, deny others access in the way you're describing?
2 replies →