← Back to context Comment by k1t 20 hours ago Yes, in some cases, eg. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46364121 5 comments k1t Reply agumonkey 20 hours ago oh that's a beautiful sighthopefully this is straw that breaks the camel's back XorNot 19 hours ago Why would that be the case? The government isn't redacting "yes we contacted aliens" they're redacting information about military capabilities that might be of use to adversaries. iberator 7 hours ago How do you know if its redacted? agumonkey 19 hours ago sorry the title mentioned epstein files, so i was hoping incriminating facts that would accelerate trump's fall 1 reply →
agumonkey 20 hours ago oh that's a beautiful sighthopefully this is straw that breaks the camel's back XorNot 19 hours ago Why would that be the case? The government isn't redacting "yes we contacted aliens" they're redacting information about military capabilities that might be of use to adversaries. iberator 7 hours ago How do you know if its redacted? agumonkey 19 hours ago sorry the title mentioned epstein files, so i was hoping incriminating facts that would accelerate trump's fall 1 reply →
XorNot 19 hours ago Why would that be the case? The government isn't redacting "yes we contacted aliens" they're redacting information about military capabilities that might be of use to adversaries. iberator 7 hours ago How do you know if its redacted? agumonkey 19 hours ago sorry the title mentioned epstein files, so i was hoping incriminating facts that would accelerate trump's fall 1 reply →
agumonkey 19 hours ago sorry the title mentioned epstein files, so i was hoping incriminating facts that would accelerate trump's fall 1 reply →
oh that's a beautiful sight
hopefully this is straw that breaks the camel's back
Why would that be the case? The government isn't redacting "yes we contacted aliens" they're redacting information about military capabilities that might be of use to adversaries.
How do you know if its redacted?
sorry the title mentioned epstein files, so i was hoping incriminating facts that would accelerate trump's fall
1 reply →