← Back to context

Comment by TheTaytay

15 hours ago

I think he’s saying it’s a fundamentally improved language at this point?

Not OP, but the case can be made that it's still the same very ugly language of 10 years ago, with few layers of sugar coating on top. The ugly hasn't gone anywhere. You still have to deal with it and suffer the cognitive burden.

  • > Not OP, but the case can be made that it's still the same very ugly language of 10 years ago, with few layers of sugar coating on top.

    Let's talk specifics. As it seems you have strong opinions, in your opinion what is the single worst aspect of JavaScript that justifies the use of the word "ugly"?