← Back to context

Comment by eviks

10 hours ago

> That is ... not at all surprising?

For the 3rd time, this conversation is not about YOU and not about what surprises you!

> "Lack of authorization" has a clear legal meaning whereas "hack" does not.

No, you've made up this limit to some "legal meaning" (also wrong here, large variety there as well but wouldn't want to endulge you further). Again, open up a dictionary on "hack", then follow the definition of "authorization" from there, if you only find "legal" in there, get a better dictionary, journalists / commenters are usually not lawyers, so they wouldn't accept your artificial legal limits on meaning!