Comment by dragonwriter

> My point with this is that lawyers, which the Department of Justice is full of, are no strangers to this process so should be able to do it adequately. If they reveal something damaging to their client this way, they themselves can get sued for whatever the damages are. So it's something they're careful about, for good reason.

> So in my opinion, it's unlikely that this is an act of resistance. Lawyers won't generally commit overt illegal acts,

Political redaction in this release under the Epstein Transparency Act is an overt, illegal act.

Does that reconfigure your estimation of whether DoJ attorneys that aren't the Trump inner-circle loyalists installed in leadership roles might engage in resistance against (or at least fail to point out methodological flaws in the inplmentation of) it?