As a someone who has traveled for work more days in the year than not, I'd much rather not require yet another device to carry and deploy in an ever changing network environment.
The multi-uplink is intriguing. While on the surface it seems that an ostensibly 'plug and play' carrier aggregation dongle (no idea if this is actually a feature) would be a easy solution to smooth out poor connections, many networking hiccups encountered during travel just boil down to impossibly terrible RF environments, regardless of the spectrum or protocol.
I did 82 days last year. Everyone travels different, but for me I feel like any time I spend watching TV in the hotel is wasted time - I'm in a whole other city, surely there's something I can do? The hotel is just somewhere to take a shower and sleep. I don't watch much TV in general though so I guess it's easier for me.
If I'm traveling for work, I'm working all day. At the end of the day I often just want to rest in the hotel room, especially if I take my dinner in a restaurant.
Typically I don't watch the hotel TV though, as I don't want to figure out what channels are on it and I probably wouldn't want to watch them anyway. If I watch anything it will be on my iPad.
It really depends. I have a friend who works in hospitality. She travels to some of the nicest hotels in world-class cities. Most of my friends who travel for work are staying in a chain hotel near an office park 25 miles outside the core city they are ostensibly traveling to.
Completely different experiences when it comes to experiencing/exploring the city.
I’m with you, I just turn on Bloomberg and leave it there. When I travel for work, I work all day (some client meetings ant night) and either work out at night or in the morning depending on time zone. Then I enjoy just walking around the city a bit and then sleep.
As a someone who has traveled for work more days in the year than not, I'd much rather not require yet another device to carry and deploy in an ever changing network environment.
The multi-uplink is intriguing. While on the surface it seems that an ostensibly 'plug and play' carrier aggregation dongle (no idea if this is actually a feature) would be a easy solution to smooth out poor connections, many networking hiccups encountered during travel just boil down to impossibly terrible RF environments, regardless of the spectrum or protocol.
I did 82 days last year. Everyone travels different, but for me I feel like any time I spend watching TV in the hotel is wasted time - I'm in a whole other city, surely there's something I can do? The hotel is just somewhere to take a shower and sleep. I don't watch much TV in general though so I guess it's easier for me.
If I'm traveling for work, I'm working all day. At the end of the day I often just want to rest in the hotel room, especially if I take my dinner in a restaurant.
Typically I don't watch the hotel TV though, as I don't want to figure out what channels are on it and I probably wouldn't want to watch them anyway. If I watch anything it will be on my iPad.
It really depends. I have a friend who works in hospitality. She travels to some of the nicest hotels in world-class cities. Most of my friends who travel for work are staying in a chain hotel near an office park 25 miles outside the core city they are ostensibly traveling to.
Completely different experiences when it comes to experiencing/exploring the city.
I’m with you, I just turn on Bloomberg and leave it there. When I travel for work, I work all day (some client meetings ant night) and either work out at night or in the morning depending on time zone. Then I enjoy just walking around the city a bit and then sleep.
I spent about 30 days this year in hotels and don't envy these people at all.
Yeah same. It is borring, yet unfamiliar enough to chill. Same thing kind of applies to eating out for every meal.
I spend about 200 days in hotels and I don’t want the extra weight or deal with dns/paywall issues