← Back to context Comment by emptysongglass 2 months ago Push costs pennies. It's an arbitrary restriction. 8 comments emptysongglass Reply Volundr 2 months ago If you want to run your own push for pennies all you have to do is compile the client yourself. emptysongglass 2 months ago I'm not going to recompile and redistribute a binary outside the Play Store. Volundr 2 months ago Then your piggybacking on their infrastructure. I don't think they are unreasonable. "It can be done for pennies, but I won't" sort of implies that it does indeed take more than pennies worth of effort. gtech1 2 months ago Then you pay for it. Nothing stops you emptysongglass 2 months ago That's precisely my point. It's an arbitrary rent-seeking restriction. dlkckvll 2 months ago Publishing an app in popular app stores, for an organization, requires several $100 in annual fees. That’s before any mobile app is even published. 2 replies →
Volundr 2 months ago If you want to run your own push for pennies all you have to do is compile the client yourself. emptysongglass 2 months ago I'm not going to recompile and redistribute a binary outside the Play Store. Volundr 2 months ago Then your piggybacking on their infrastructure. I don't think they are unreasonable. "It can be done for pennies, but I won't" sort of implies that it does indeed take more than pennies worth of effort.
emptysongglass 2 months ago I'm not going to recompile and redistribute a binary outside the Play Store. Volundr 2 months ago Then your piggybacking on their infrastructure. I don't think they are unreasonable. "It can be done for pennies, but I won't" sort of implies that it does indeed take more than pennies worth of effort.
Volundr 2 months ago Then your piggybacking on their infrastructure. I don't think they are unreasonable. "It can be done for pennies, but I won't" sort of implies that it does indeed take more than pennies worth of effort.
gtech1 2 months ago Then you pay for it. Nothing stops you emptysongglass 2 months ago That's precisely my point. It's an arbitrary rent-seeking restriction. dlkckvll 2 months ago Publishing an app in popular app stores, for an organization, requires several $100 in annual fees. That’s before any mobile app is even published. 2 replies →
emptysongglass 2 months ago That's precisely my point. It's an arbitrary rent-seeking restriction. dlkckvll 2 months ago Publishing an app in popular app stores, for an organization, requires several $100 in annual fees. That’s before any mobile app is even published. 2 replies →
dlkckvll 2 months ago Publishing an app in popular app stores, for an organization, requires several $100 in annual fees. That’s before any mobile app is even published. 2 replies →
If you want to run your own push for pennies all you have to do is compile the client yourself.
I'm not going to recompile and redistribute a binary outside the Play Store.
Then your piggybacking on their infrastructure. I don't think they are unreasonable. "It can be done for pennies, but I won't" sort of implies that it does indeed take more than pennies worth of effort.
Then you pay for it. Nothing stops you
That's precisely my point. It's an arbitrary rent-seeking restriction.
Publishing an app in popular app stores, for an organization, requires several $100 in annual fees. That’s before any mobile app is even published.
2 replies →