← Back to context Comment by emptysongglass 25 days ago Push costs pennies. It's an arbitrary restriction. 8 comments emptysongglass Reply Volundr 25 days ago If you want to run your own push for pennies all you have to do is compile the client yourself. emptysongglass 25 days ago I'm not going to recompile and redistribute a binary outside the Play Store. Volundr 25 days ago Then your piggybacking on their infrastructure. I don't think they are unreasonable. "It can be done for pennies, but I won't" sort of implies that it does indeed take more than pennies worth of effort. gtech1 25 days ago Then you pay for it. Nothing stops you emptysongglass 25 days ago That's precisely my point. It's an arbitrary rent-seeking restriction. dlkckvll 25 days ago Publishing an app in popular app stores, for an organization, requires several $100 in annual fees. That’s before any mobile app is even published. 2 replies →
Volundr 25 days ago If you want to run your own push for pennies all you have to do is compile the client yourself. emptysongglass 25 days ago I'm not going to recompile and redistribute a binary outside the Play Store. Volundr 25 days ago Then your piggybacking on their infrastructure. I don't think they are unreasonable. "It can be done for pennies, but I won't" sort of implies that it does indeed take more than pennies worth of effort.
emptysongglass 25 days ago I'm not going to recompile and redistribute a binary outside the Play Store. Volundr 25 days ago Then your piggybacking on their infrastructure. I don't think they are unreasonable. "It can be done for pennies, but I won't" sort of implies that it does indeed take more than pennies worth of effort.
Volundr 25 days ago Then your piggybacking on their infrastructure. I don't think they are unreasonable. "It can be done for pennies, but I won't" sort of implies that it does indeed take more than pennies worth of effort.
gtech1 25 days ago Then you pay for it. Nothing stops you emptysongglass 25 days ago That's precisely my point. It's an arbitrary rent-seeking restriction. dlkckvll 25 days ago Publishing an app in popular app stores, for an organization, requires several $100 in annual fees. That’s before any mobile app is even published. 2 replies →
emptysongglass 25 days ago That's precisely my point. It's an arbitrary rent-seeking restriction. dlkckvll 25 days ago Publishing an app in popular app stores, for an organization, requires several $100 in annual fees. That’s before any mobile app is even published. 2 replies →
dlkckvll 25 days ago Publishing an app in popular app stores, for an organization, requires several $100 in annual fees. That’s before any mobile app is even published. 2 replies →
If you want to run your own push for pennies all you have to do is compile the client yourself.
I'm not going to recompile and redistribute a binary outside the Play Store.
Then your piggybacking on their infrastructure. I don't think they are unreasonable. "It can be done for pennies, but I won't" sort of implies that it does indeed take more than pennies worth of effort.
Then you pay for it. Nothing stops you
That's precisely my point. It's an arbitrary rent-seeking restriction.
Publishing an app in popular app stores, for an organization, requires several $100 in annual fees. That’s before any mobile app is even published.
2 replies →