← Back to context

Comment by sojournerc

2 months ago

Food is frivolous!? Good God the future is bleak.

Food isn't frivolous, meat arguably is if you're talking about efficiency.

You've got to feed a cow for a year and half until it's slaughtered. That's a whole lot of input, for a cow's worth of meat output.

  • [flagged]

    • I've got my doubts, because current AI tech doesn't quite live in the real world.

      In the real world something like inventing a meat substitute is thorny problem that must be solved in meatspace, not in math. Anything from not squicking out the customers, to being practical and cheap to produce, to tasting good, to being safe to eat long term.

      I mean, maybe some day we'll have a comprehensive model of humans to the point that we can objectively describe the taste of a steak and then calculate whether a given mix and processing of various ingredients will taste close enough, but we're nowhere near that yet.

Meat is not necessary.

  • The only way to phase out meat is to make a replacement that actually tastes good.

    Come to the american south and ask them to try tempeh. They'll look at you like you asked them to eat roaches.

    It's a cultural thing.

    • Taste has nothing to do with it; 'tis is all based on economics and the actual way to stop meat consumption is to simply remove big-ag tax subsidies and other externalized costs of production which are not actually realized by the consumer. A burger would cost more than most can afford and the free market would take care of this problem without additional intervention. Unfortunately, we do not have a free market.

      8 replies →

  • Comfortable clothes aren't necessary. Food with flavor isn't necessary... We should all just eat ground up crickets in beige cubicles because of how many unnecessary things we could get rid of. /s