← Back to context Comment by bronson 2 months ago So the author sent spam that they're not interested in? That's terrible. 3 comments bronson Reply jdiff 2 months ago One additional bit of context, they provided guidelines and instructions specifically to send emails and verify their successful delivery so that the "random act of kindness" could be properly reported and measured at the end of this experiment. twoodfin 2 months ago I think the key misalignment here is whether the output of an appropriately prompted LLM can ever be considered an “act of kindness”. mckn1ght 2 months ago At least in this case, it’s indeed quite Orwellian.
jdiff 2 months ago One additional bit of context, they provided guidelines and instructions specifically to send emails and verify their successful delivery so that the "random act of kindness" could be properly reported and measured at the end of this experiment. twoodfin 2 months ago I think the key misalignment here is whether the output of an appropriately prompted LLM can ever be considered an “act of kindness”. mckn1ght 2 months ago At least in this case, it’s indeed quite Orwellian.
twoodfin 2 months ago I think the key misalignment here is whether the output of an appropriately prompted LLM can ever be considered an “act of kindness”. mckn1ght 2 months ago At least in this case, it’s indeed quite Orwellian.
One additional bit of context, they provided guidelines and instructions specifically to send emails and verify their successful delivery so that the "random act of kindness" could be properly reported and measured at the end of this experiment.
I think the key misalignment here is whether the output of an appropriately prompted LLM can ever be considered an “act of kindness”.
At least in this case, it’s indeed quite Orwellian.