← Back to context

Comment by Zenbit_UX

2 months ago

I truly don’t understand comments like this.

You agreed with the other poster while reframing their ideas in slightly different words without adding anything to the conversation?

Most confusingly you did so in emphatic statements reminiscent of a disagreement or argument without there being one

> no computer system just does stuff on its own.

This was the exact statement the GP was making, even going so far as to dox the nonprofit directors to hold them accountable… then you added nothing but confusion.

> a human (or collection of them) built and maintains the system, they are responsible for it

Yup, GP covered this word for word… AI village built this system.

Why did you write this?

Is this a new form of AI? A human with low English proficiency? A strange type of empathetically supportive comment from someone who doesn’t understand that’s the function of the upvote button in online message boards?

my point was more concise and general (should I have just commented instead of replying?), sorry you’re so offended and not sure why you felt the need to write this (you can downvote)

accusing people of being AI is very low-effort bot behavior btw

  • seems to me when this kind of stuff happens, there's usually something else completely unrelated, and your comment was simply the first one they happened to have latched onto. surely by itself it is not enough to elicit that kind of reaction

    • I do see the point a bit? and like a reasonable comment to that effect sure, I probably don’t respond and take it into account going forward

      but accusing me of being deficient in English or some AI system is…odd…

      especially while doing (the opposite of) the exact thing they’re complaining about. upvote/downvote and move on. I do tend to regret commenting on here myself FWIW because of interactions like this

      1 reply →