Comment by rezonant

I don't think you're really losing the ability to check if an object responds to a message ie a_car.respond_to?(:color) just because theres type annotations. And I assume the type checker doesnt yell if you do a_car.color after that -- or if it does there's surely an equivalent to Typescript's `any` to accomplish it.

And T-Ruby apparently provides interfaces to avoid needing to do this at all (assuming both sides are written in T-Ruby I assume) https://type-ruby.github.io/docs/learn/interfaces/defining-i...

...which is awesome!

As for authoring classes, respond_to_missing?/method_missing should be rare, usually in a situation where its the only way to accomplish something. There's never been a reason to write something like:

    class Car
        def respond_to_missing?(name, priv)
            [:color, :color=].include?(name)
        end
        def method_missing(name, *args, &block)
            if name == :color
                @color
            elsif name == :color=
                @color = args.first
            end
        end
    end

Instead of

    class Car
        def color; @color; end
        def color=(value); @color = value; end
    end

Or, more idiomatically

    class Car
        attr_accessor :color
    end

And for that last case, T-Ruby apparently covers it with:

    class Car
        attr_accessor :color: String
    end