← Back to context Comment by uecker 3 hours ago These do not seem to be the safety improvements for C that you requested. 1 comment uecker Reply pjmlp 1 hour ago They do, by decreasing the dependency on C, and the lack of interest WG14 shows in improving C.It is like gardening, slowly taking away all the paths bad weeds are still able to spoil the garden.We might not remove all of them, however if they are only able to thrive on a little gardner corner surrouned by sand is already an improvement.
pjmlp 1 hour ago They do, by decreasing the dependency on C, and the lack of interest WG14 shows in improving C.It is like gardening, slowly taking away all the paths bad weeds are still able to spoil the garden.We might not remove all of them, however if they are only able to thrive on a little gardner corner surrouned by sand is already an improvement.
They do, by decreasing the dependency on C, and the lack of interest WG14 shows in improving C.
It is like gardening, slowly taking away all the paths bad weeds are still able to spoil the garden.
We might not remove all of them, however if they are only able to thrive on a little gardner corner surrouned by sand is already an improvement.