← Back to context

Comment by stinkbeetle

7 hours ago

Looks like one of the white knights of the left is riding in on an extremely high horse to defend the poor simple indigenous folx. Bravo.

I'm so glad you were able to police my other comments too, they're also wrong but you're incapable of addressing them so you just decree with no evidence rquired that they make me "MAGA-adjacent" and therefore a bad person. Apparently it's fine to have grievance rhetoric against governments except when the corrupt warmongers happen to be the secular high priests of your religion. This is so great! I'm sorry for all the violent hate speech that offended you so, my liege.

I agree, it's much better to name the movement you represent by its original name and don't waste time trying to engage in conversation.

  • What do you agree with? And what is it much much better than?

    • He’s simply asking you to unsarcastically state what your position and movement actually are, instead of hiding behind ironic edgelording, performative grievance theatrics, and a Heisenbergian fog in which, by design, measuring one makes the other conveniently unknowable -- and everything remains safely entangled.

      You don't need to ask him to explain how he observed you, you're the only one who knows what you really mean.

      It's time for the Festivus Feats of Strength. Ball's in your court, Georgie!

      https://youtu.be/1njzgXSzA-A?t=255