← Back to context Comment by exabrial 2 days ago Why is anyone using mongo for literally anything 6 comments exabrial Reply nine_k 2 days ago Easy replication. I suppose it's faster than Postgres's JSONB, too.I would rather not use it, but I see that there are legitimate cases where MongoDB or DynamoDB is a technically appropriate choice. mickael-kerjean 2 days ago because it is "web scale"ref: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2F-DItXtZs DonHopkins 1 day ago Whenever anyone writes about mongodb or redis I hear it in that voice. gethly 1 day ago Right? When they came out, it was all about NoSQL, which then turned out only mean key-value database, whom are plentiful. Aldipower 2 days ago This is a nasty ad repositorium datorum argumentation which I cannot tolerate. exabrial 21 hours ago I laughed.
nine_k 2 days ago Easy replication. I suppose it's faster than Postgres's JSONB, too.I would rather not use it, but I see that there are legitimate cases where MongoDB or DynamoDB is a technically appropriate choice.
mickael-kerjean 2 days ago because it is "web scale"ref: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2F-DItXtZs DonHopkins 1 day ago Whenever anyone writes about mongodb or redis I hear it in that voice.
gethly 1 day ago Right? When they came out, it was all about NoSQL, which then turned out only mean key-value database, whom are plentiful.
Aldipower 2 days ago This is a nasty ad repositorium datorum argumentation which I cannot tolerate. exabrial 21 hours ago I laughed.
Easy replication. I suppose it's faster than Postgres's JSONB, too.
I would rather not use it, but I see that there are legitimate cases where MongoDB or DynamoDB is a technically appropriate choice.
because it is "web scale"
ref: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2F-DItXtZs
Whenever anyone writes about mongodb or redis I hear it in that voice.
Right? When they came out, it was all about NoSQL, which then turned out only mean key-value database, whom are plentiful.
This is a nasty ad repositorium datorum argumentation which I cannot tolerate.
I laughed.