← Back to context Comment by jedberg 1 day ago For comparison, GM brought in $1.3B on $48B. 5 comments jedberg Reply mxschumacher 1 day ago and Tesla is valued at over 21x more than GM awesome_dude 1 day ago Sorry, I lost the thread - GM looks twice as profitable, the same profit on half the revenueHow does that justify Tesla's valuation?Is it based on the idea that the margin can be improved? andsoitis 1 day ago > Sorry, I lost the thread - GM looks twice as profitableYou got it reversed.For Q3'2025, GM net income $1.3B on $48B revenue (down 0.3% YoY). Tesla, in contrast, generated $1.5B income on $28B revenue (up 12% YoY).GM's income was down 56.6% while Tesla's was down 37%.GM had higher operating income than Tesla, however. Explained by Tesla's more aggressive investment in R&D and AI. 1 reply → moogly 1 day ago It's based on "Tesla shareholders want the stock to live in a parallel universe".
mxschumacher 1 day ago and Tesla is valued at over 21x more than GM awesome_dude 1 day ago Sorry, I lost the thread - GM looks twice as profitable, the same profit on half the revenueHow does that justify Tesla's valuation?Is it based on the idea that the margin can be improved? andsoitis 1 day ago > Sorry, I lost the thread - GM looks twice as profitableYou got it reversed.For Q3'2025, GM net income $1.3B on $48B revenue (down 0.3% YoY). Tesla, in contrast, generated $1.5B income on $28B revenue (up 12% YoY).GM's income was down 56.6% while Tesla's was down 37%.GM had higher operating income than Tesla, however. Explained by Tesla's more aggressive investment in R&D and AI. 1 reply → moogly 1 day ago It's based on "Tesla shareholders want the stock to live in a parallel universe".
awesome_dude 1 day ago Sorry, I lost the thread - GM looks twice as profitable, the same profit on half the revenueHow does that justify Tesla's valuation?Is it based on the idea that the margin can be improved? andsoitis 1 day ago > Sorry, I lost the thread - GM looks twice as profitableYou got it reversed.For Q3'2025, GM net income $1.3B on $48B revenue (down 0.3% YoY). Tesla, in contrast, generated $1.5B income on $28B revenue (up 12% YoY).GM's income was down 56.6% while Tesla's was down 37%.GM had higher operating income than Tesla, however. Explained by Tesla's more aggressive investment in R&D and AI. 1 reply → moogly 1 day ago It's based on "Tesla shareholders want the stock to live in a parallel universe".
andsoitis 1 day ago > Sorry, I lost the thread - GM looks twice as profitableYou got it reversed.For Q3'2025, GM net income $1.3B on $48B revenue (down 0.3% YoY). Tesla, in contrast, generated $1.5B income on $28B revenue (up 12% YoY).GM's income was down 56.6% while Tesla's was down 37%.GM had higher operating income than Tesla, however. Explained by Tesla's more aggressive investment in R&D and AI. 1 reply →
and Tesla is valued at over 21x more than GM
Sorry, I lost the thread - GM looks twice as profitable, the same profit on half the revenue
How does that justify Tesla's valuation?
Is it based on the idea that the margin can be improved?
> Sorry, I lost the thread - GM looks twice as profitable
You got it reversed.
For Q3'2025, GM net income $1.3B on $48B revenue (down 0.3% YoY). Tesla, in contrast, generated $1.5B income on $28B revenue (up 12% YoY).
GM's income was down 56.6% while Tesla's was down 37%.
GM had higher operating income than Tesla, however. Explained by Tesla's more aggressive investment in R&D and AI.
1 reply →
It's based on "Tesla shareholders want the stock to live in a parallel universe".