← Back to context

Comment by joenot443

18 hours ago

You're right - it was called FoxTrax, it's a fairly interesting piece of engineering.

It's pretty wild they were able to convince the NHL to use a modified puck with a battery and PCB inside, all so American viewers could better follow the action.

It was not well received in Canada :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FoxTrax

Well, the current puck still has emitters inside of it.

> [1] Puck and Player Tracking became fully operational in 2021-22, with up to 20 cameras in each arena and infrared emitters in each puck and sweater.

The player tracking is fairly easy to see; there's often an airtag sized bump on a player's jersey.

The puck tracking can be a bit more difficult but sometimes the puck looks like it's melting the ice behind it. That's just them giving it a grey shadow instead of the neon shadow.

[1]: https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-edge-launches-website-for-puck-...

It was not well received anywhere. However, in a bit of defense of the idea, TV at that time was still NTSC (~480p resolution at 24 frames/s) and it was pretty hard to see the puck even if you knew where it was.

As someone with low vision I loved when they added that and missed it when it was gone.

I can't see the puck at all at a game and have to be very close to a television to see whats going on.

As a result most sports are boring.