← Back to context

Comment by yoyohello13

17 hours ago

Finally a voice of reason. The tools will just get better and easier to use. I use LLMs now, but I'm not going to dump a bunch of time learning the new hotness. I'll let other people do that and pickup the useful pieces later.

Unless your gunning for a top position as a vibe coder, this whole concept of "falling behind" is just pure FOMO.

Doing small project for customer. They have explicit instructions that I can't even use some unapproved AI... So well they are paying. So until it is actually forced I see no pressure to move there.

And rest of my field. Automated tools do part of work. AI probably some, but not enough of actually verifying findings and then properly explaining the context and implications.

Yeah that's my view too. It's definitely fine to wait a couple of years (at least), and see what emerged as most effective and then just learn that, instead of dumping a ton of time now into keeping up with the hamster wheel.

Unless you're in web dev because it seems like that's one of the few domains where AI actually works pretty well today.

  • Or if you like learning new stuff. Personally that has been best part of being programmer.

> Unless your gunning for a top position as a vibe coder, this whole concept of "falling behind" is just pure FOMO.

???

  • The person you're quoting has a point. Everyone is losing their minds about this. Not everyone needs to be on top of AI developmemts all the time. I don't mean you ignore LLMs, just don't chase every fad.

    The classic line (which I've quoted a few times here) by Charles Mackay from 1841 comes to mind:

    "Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    "[...] In reading The History of Nations, we find that, like individuals, they have their whims and their peculiarities, their seasons of excitement and recklessness, when they care not what they do. We find that whole communities suddenly fix their minds upon one object and go mad in its pursuit; that millions of people become simultaneously impressed with one delusion, and run after it, till their attention is caught by some new folly more captivating than the first."

    Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds

    • Thank you for the subtitles, it's not like I didn't understand the lingo, I just couldn't make sense of the implied meaning.