← Back to context Comment by zahlman 18 hours ago Okay, but is aiming for 100% coverage really why the bad tests are bad? 2 comments zahlman Reply marcosdumay 9 hours ago Aiming for 100% coverage is almost certain to cause bad tests, yes.But not all bad tests come from a goal of 100% coverage. jeltz 13 hours ago In most cases I have seen bad tests, yes.
marcosdumay 9 hours ago Aiming for 100% coverage is almost certain to cause bad tests, yes.But not all bad tests come from a goal of 100% coverage.
Aiming for 100% coverage is almost certain to cause bad tests, yes.
But not all bad tests come from a goal of 100% coverage.
In most cases I have seen bad tests, yes.