Comment by throwaway198846
14 hours ago
No, you missed the point. They have been indicated to "as co-perpetrators for committing the acts jointly with others: the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts". Physical destruction can occur without being a war crime and those war crimes can occur without any destruction. So it didn't add any useful information infact it was actively misleading because some people might think they were indicated for destruction.
I have a hard time understanding what you're upset about. "The destruction of Gaza" is clearly a context that anyone in the world can recognize.
The statement is simply referring to that. Not everything has to be maximally technical.
Your nitpick added zero value to the discussion.