← Back to context

Comment by kergonath

4 hours ago

> Many members of the UN are openly biased against Israel

OTOH, why would anybody not be biased against an agressive, xenophobic theocracy bent on illegally occupying and annexing its neighbour, all the while whining that "they want to destroy us and deny the existence of the Israeli state", and then with the other side of their mouth "all Palestinians must die and their homeland belongs to us"? The mind boggles.

> many are officially against the very existence of Israel and have always been

Here we go.

> and they happily vote on any condemnation of Israel regardless of what Israel does.

Israel following up on their promise and actually applying the treaties they signed never got them any condemnation. Them doing the exact opposite obviously does.

> This includes countries that have ethnically cleansed their Jews, and countries that do not allow Jews to enter.

Someone being oppressed does not justify them then oppressing others. I can’t believe this still needs to be said.

> Someone being oppressed does not justify them then oppressing others.

That’s not the point. A country that has a history of hatred against a group, to the point of ethnic cleansing, and has not changed on the matter, has no legitimacy in critisizing or making judgments on that group.

I think this would be obvious in any other context.