← Back to context

Comment by lotsofpulp

7 hours ago

Yes, no one is stopping US (or other countries’) taxpayers from paying for all the drug trials so that the resulting medicines are in the public domain.

> False. Insurance companies in the US own stock in big pharma firms like Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly, etc. They maintain substantial investment portfolios and generate returns on premiums and reserves. They also have voting rights as institutional investors.

This is a wild assertion. The sum total of all 7 publicly listed insurance companies’ market caps is less than Eli Lilly, just one pharmaceutical company. I would need some evidence before believing that health insurance company leaders have any influence on pharmaceutical companies.

I would also be surprised to learn insurance companies hold specific stocks, seems like a risk insurance companies would not take, especially ones that have lots of routine cash expenses. They spend ~85% of their premiums on medical expenses, and probably at least 5% to 10% on their own staff, so they shouldn’t even have much extra cash left to invest for the long term.

https://www.oliverwyman.com/our-expertise/insights/2023/mar/...

Edit: hit posting limit, so to respond to comment below about net income, that Yale link does not seem relevant as it is for all healthcare companies. All 7 publicly listed insurers’ combined annual net income is $35B or less for the previous 20 years, at a profit margin of 3% or less, which is peanuts. The pharmaceutical companies earn much more money than them, which is why the pharmaceutical companies have higher market caps.

> Why are we using market cap as a metric ? Look at investment value.

Because a company that owns influential portions of another company would have that reflected in their market cap. Like Berkshire Hathaway does. with the exception of UNH (due to its healthcare provider business), the other insurance companies are relatively tiny businesses compared to pharmaceutical companies and so cannot be holding any influential amount of stock.

> This is a wild assertion. The sum total of all 7 publicly listed insurance companies’ market caps is less than Eli Lilly, just one pharmaceutical company

Why are we using market cap as a metric ? Look at investment value.

From the NAIC report at https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/capital-markets..., common stock holdings alone of U.S. insurance industry is roughly ~$1.2 trillion.

"Over the past 20 years, health care companies spent 95% of their net income on shareholder payouts, totaling up to $2.6 trillion, according to the research findings. Shareholder payouts also tripled over this period - a trend largely shaped by a few powerful pharmaceutical companies, the research team noted."

https://medicine.yale.edu/news-article/health-care-company-p...

The U.S taxpayer already pays for this. ~40% of FDA-approved drugs have direct NIH funding behind them. Nearly all modern drugs rely on NIH-funded foundational science. Taxpayer money additionally also floats through BARDA, DOD and DARPA.

COVID mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna) got billions in public funding. Yet, patents usually belong to the private company and prices are not capped as a condition of public funding. It is gross corruption begging for heads to be put on pikes.

  • Correct, people should be asking their federal politician why the US federal government is not spending the few billion dollars on drug trials to avoid having to pay extra to pharmaceutical companies.

    But instead, people rail at health insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies and others who can’t or won’t make a difference.

    • > But instead, people rail at health insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies and others who can’t or won’t make a difference.

      Because this is the Corrupt Evil Nexus that continues to ensure that taxpayer funds and exclusive patents keep flowing to them, while keeping prices high. They buy political power via campaign financing by the bucketload and the congressman/woman changes their vote to kill/oppose bills that would make a difference. You can find dozens of examples. Do your own research. As an example, take a look at the voting for the bill to permit Medicare to negotiate drug prices. Look at who received bribes and from whom to vote "No".

      2 replies →