← Back to context Comment by tweakimp 12 hours ago Why is y+2x optimal at (0,3) with a value of 3? Isnt it (3,0) with a value of 6? 3 comments tweakimp Reply nchagnet 11 hours ago Good catch! Especially since I ended up drawing y - x = C but didn't update the legend. I updated it! tomtom1337 11 hours ago Haha, I started reading this, got interrupted, came back and got confused by the graph. Then came to the comments, saw your comment, reloaded the post and voila!Thank you for a lovely post! abhishekbasu 12 hours ago you're right, it should be (3,0) with optimal obj value of 6.
nchagnet 11 hours ago Good catch! Especially since I ended up drawing y - x = C but didn't update the legend. I updated it! tomtom1337 11 hours ago Haha, I started reading this, got interrupted, came back and got confused by the graph. Then came to the comments, saw your comment, reloaded the post and voila!Thank you for a lovely post!
tomtom1337 11 hours ago Haha, I started reading this, got interrupted, came back and got confused by the graph. Then came to the comments, saw your comment, reloaded the post and voila!Thank you for a lovely post!
Good catch! Especially since I ended up drawing y - x = C but didn't update the legend. I updated it!
Haha, I started reading this, got interrupted, came back and got confused by the graph. Then came to the comments, saw your comment, reloaded the post and voila!
Thank you for a lovely post!
you're right, it should be (3,0) with optimal obj value of 6.