← Back to context Comment by lionkor 2 months ago You don't know when it's wrong. 3 comments lionkor Reply fc417fc802 2 months ago People used to say the same things about Wikipedia. They weren't wrong. Still aren't. But it sort of misses the point. lionkor 2 months ago That's an entirely different system because it's quite transparent fc417fc802 2 months ago Sure, well cited LLM output is better than opaque. You still don't immediately know when it's wrong though. Same as Wikipedia.Despite that, both are incredibly useful if used correctly.
fc417fc802 2 months ago People used to say the same things about Wikipedia. They weren't wrong. Still aren't. But it sort of misses the point. lionkor 2 months ago That's an entirely different system because it's quite transparent fc417fc802 2 months ago Sure, well cited LLM output is better than opaque. You still don't immediately know when it's wrong though. Same as Wikipedia.Despite that, both are incredibly useful if used correctly.
lionkor 2 months ago That's an entirely different system because it's quite transparent fc417fc802 2 months ago Sure, well cited LLM output is better than opaque. You still don't immediately know when it's wrong though. Same as Wikipedia.Despite that, both are incredibly useful if used correctly.
fc417fc802 2 months ago Sure, well cited LLM output is better than opaque. You still don't immediately know when it's wrong though. Same as Wikipedia.Despite that, both are incredibly useful if used correctly.
People used to say the same things about Wikipedia. They weren't wrong. Still aren't. But it sort of misses the point.
That's an entirely different system because it's quite transparent
Sure, well cited LLM output is better than opaque. You still don't immediately know when it's wrong though. Same as Wikipedia.
Despite that, both are incredibly useful if used correctly.