← Back to context

Comment by zug_zug

6 hours ago

[flagged]

For "skeptic" read "contrarian". It's probably for the best that the author is spending less time online, given how the Glinner radicalization pipeline destroyed Glinner and various other people.

  • Two helpful references:

    "Radicalisation pipeline:"

    * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right_pipeline

    Who is "Glinner":

    * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Linehan

    Rationalists and "skeptics" aren't really capable of maintaining a robust club because a) it's hard to find healthy critical thinking in societies that are still addled in a swamp of tribalism from millennia ago, and b) not believing in fables is a weak social pretext. (Hey, let's get together for pints and not believe in $somegroup's ravings.)

    The application of rational thought is an educational process. With all the inherent fragility of any educational process.

> we all acknowledged that all that "anti-woke"/"free-speech" stuff was a complete smokescreen

Tell me you're in an echo chamber without telling me you're in an echo chamber.