← Back to context

Comment by wpietri

6 hours ago

Is the distinction arbitrary? It sounded like issues are used for clear, completable jobs for the maintainers. A mysterious bug is not that. The other work you describe is clearly happening, so I'm not seeing a problem with this approach other than its novelty for users. But to me it looks both clearer than the usual "issue soup" on a popular open source project and more effective at using maintainer time, so next time I open-source something I'd be inclined to try it.

Some people see "bug tracker" and think "a vetted report of a problem that needs fixing", others see "bug tracker" and think "a task/todo list of stuff ready for an engineer to work on"

Both are valid, and it makes sense to be clear about what the teams view is