Comment by rednafi

How many times do you actually need to look at large JSONs? The cost of readability is too high, IMO.

Personally, I don't spend much time looking at complex JSON; a binary format like Protobuf along with a typed DSL is often what you need. You can still derive JSON from Proto if you need that. In return, you get faster transport and type safety.

Also, on another note, tools like jq are so ubiquitous that any format that isn't directly supported by jq will have a really hard time seeing mass adoption.